When you first learned about the molar mass of molecules, you learned that the molar mass is linked to the identity of the compound; for example, H2O always had a molar mass of 18 g/mol. If the molar mass wasn't 18g/mol, it couldn't be water! The situation is very different for polymers. Take polypropylene, for example:

The molar mass of this polymer could be 420 g/mol (if degree of polymerization is 10) or 21,000 g/mol (if the degree of polymerization is 500). Although vastly different in molar mass, both of these molecules are polypropylene. For polymers, there is almost always a molar mass distribution. An example distribution is given in Figure 1.10. Although this curve looks continuous, we know that in fact it cannot be - the mass of the polymer does change in discreet units, depending on the size of the repeat unit. However, we do typically draw the distributions as continuous function.

Introduction to Polymers, Third Edition, CRC Press, 2011.
Because there is a distribution in molar mass, we have a choice as to how to actually define a characteristic molar mass for a sample. There are three general approaches for calculating the molar mass from a distribution, giving us three different values: (number average molar mass), , (weight average molar mass) and (z-average molar mass). You'll notice from Figure 1.10 that . Each value of molar mass is defined differently.
is defined as the sum of the products of the molar mass of each size of polymer multiplied by its mole fraction (X). Recall from general chemistry that a mole fraction is equal to the ratio of number of moles (or molecules) of a type of polymer (N) divided by the total number of moles (or molecules). Basically, this is the same as your "average" arithmetic mean!
Sometimes it's easier for us to work in weight fractions () rather than mole fractions, since mass is often easier to measure. The weight fraction is defined as the mass of molecules of molar mass divided by the total mass of all the molecules present:
Thus, we can define :
Compare to — do you notice how is a function if squared? Therefore, bigger polymers have a greater influence on than they do on , skewing the value of to be larger than .