Carothers Theory: Stoichiometric Imbalance of Reactive Groups

Carothers Theory: Stoichiometric Imbalance of Reactive Groups

If there is a stoichiometric imbalance, we consider the reactant ratio, r:

r= N A N B

We always have a choice of which groups are A and which groups are B; here, we must define the reactant ratio such that it is equal to or less than 1. The way we have defined r, then the A groups would be in the minority.

Now because we are still confining our analysis to linear polymerization, each monomer has only 2 reactive groups. So, the total number of molecules initially present can be represented as:

N O = N A + N B 2

Let’s simplify this expression, and try to represent N O  as a function of only the number of B groups for instance, but substituting in r:

N O = N B ( 1+r ) 2

Consider the following example, which is a modification of Figure 3.1. Notice, we now have a different number of A and B groups:

Stiochiometric imbalance of A and B
Figure 3.4: Stoichiometric imbalance of A and B
Source: Lauren Zarzar

Our minority functional group is A. So our reactant ratio is:

r= N A N B = 7 9

We can still define an extent of reaction:

p= #minority functional groups reacted #minority functional groups initially = 3 7

Let’s keep our eye on the prize: we want to be able to define x ¯ n  as a function of r and p. How can we do this?  Similarly to our derivation with the case of stoichiometric balance, we need to have an expression for N, the number of molecules remaining. The number of molecules remaining is:

N= #unreacted functional groups #functional groups per molecule

Convince yourself with our example that this is true. There are 10 unreacted A and B groups, and 2 functional groups per molecule. Thus, we have 5 molecules remaining; and indeed we do! But how can we write N as a function of r and p? Let’s rewrite our expression for N, taking into account that we already know there are 2 functional groups per molecule, and we only have A and B unreacted groups:

N= ( #unreacted A )+( #unreacted B ) 2

We can define #unreacted A  as:

# unreacted A = # A present initially - # A reacted

# unreacted A = r N B ( 1p )

We can define #unreacted B  as:

# unreacted B = N B p N A N B ( 1rp )

Notice that the because A only reacts with B, the number of A groups that react ( p N A )  is the same as the number of B groups that react.

Try plugging some numbers in from our example in Figure 3 to convince yourself these expressions hold.

# unreacted A groups = r N B ( 1p )= 7 9 ( 9 )( 1 3 7 )=4

# unreacted B groups = N B ( 1rp )=9( 1 7 9  3 7 )=6

Ultimately, we wanted to write our expression for N in terms of r and p. So:

N= ( # unreacted A )+( # unreacted B ) 2 = r N B ( 1p )+ N B ( 1rp ) 2

We can simplify:

N= N B ( 1+r2rp ) 2

Now, finally, we have expressions for N  and N O  which we substitute into our general expression for x ¯ n

x ¯ n = N o N = N B ( 1+r ) 2 N B ( 1+r2rp ) 2 = 1+r 1+r2rp

Finally, we have a more general Carothers equation that is now applicable to polymerization with non-stoichiometric balance of reactive groups. And what does this equation tell us? If you want polymers of any significant length (high degree of polymerization) you need VERY HIGH extent of reaction AND to control r as close to 1 as possible!

Table 3.1 (Table 3.3 in the text) calculates values of degree of polymerization for varying values of extent of reaction and reactant ratio. Take a look; you may be surprised really how high extent of reaction needs to be in order to get polymers of any significant length, especially as your reactant ratio deviates more greatly from 1.

x ¯ n = 1+r 1+r2rp

General Carothers Equation: Equation 3.7 from Young, Robert J., and Peter A. Lovell.
Introduction to Polymers, Third Edition, CRC Press, 2011.
Table 3.1 - Variation of x ¯ n  with p and r according to Equation 3.7 (General Carothers Equation)

x ¯ n

at

Reliability ( )p = 0.90p = 0.95p = 0.99p = 0.999p = 1.000 1
r = 1.00010.0 220.0100.01000.0infinity
r = 0.99910.019.895.3666.81999.0
r = 0.9909.618.366.8166.1199.0
r = 0.9508.113.428.337.639.0
r = 0.9006.810.016.118.719.0 3

1 - As p1, x ¯ n  ( 1+r ) ( 1r ) 
2 - Only 10 maximum for p=0.9!
3 - Only 19 maximum for r=0.9!

Source: Table 3.3 from Young, Robert J., and Peter A. Lovell.
Introduction to Polymers, Third Edition, CRC Press, 2011.

These short chains are barely polymers!

PROBLEM


You’re polymerizing the two monomers shown below. You want to limit your number average degree of polymerization to 39. Assuming you can achieve a quantitative reaction (p approaching 1), and you start with 2 moles of phenolphthalein as your limiting reagent, then how many moles of terephthaloyl chloride should you use?

molecular diagrams of Phenolphthalein and terephthaloyl chloride (TCL)
Phenolphthalein (left) and terephthaloyl chloride (TCL) (right)
Source: Lauren Zarzar

ANSWER


We are told degree of polymerization, xn is 39. We can therefore use the Carothers equation to solve for reactant ratio:

x ¯ n =39= 1+r 1+r2r( 1 )

r= 38 40 =0.95

Once we know the reactant ratio, that tells us the mole ratio of reactive groups that we should use. Since the reactant ratio always has to be 1 or less, and we are told that phenolphthalein is the limiting reagent (and we have 2 moles of it, with 2 functional groups per molecule), we define the reactant ratio as:

r=0.95= N A N B

= mol phenolphthalein2 mol terephthaloyl chloride2

= 2 mol terephthaloylchloride

We solve for moles of terephthaloyl chloride, which equals 2.1 moles.