4.3h Summary

Of the methods we’ve discussed, there are pretreatment options that lead the others (some under commercialization). The current leading pretreatment options include dilute acid, AFEX, liquid hot water, lime, and aqueous ammonia, with dilute acid and water, AFEX, and lime under commercialization. The figure below shows switchgrass before pretreatment and after several pretreatment options, i.e., AFEX, dilute acid, liquid hot water, lime, and soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA).

Resulting Switchgrass Solids stages after Different Pretreatment Technologies as described below.

The Resulting Switchgrass Solids after Different Pretreatment Technologies.

The image displays six samples of switchgrass, each subjected to a different pretreatment method, arranged side by side for visual comparison. The samples are labeled from A to F, with each label corresponding to a specific treatment:

  • A. Control – Untreated switchgrass, serving as the baseline for comparison.
  • B. AFEX – Treated with Ammonia Fiber Expansion, a method used to enhance biomass digestibility.
  • C. Dil. Acid – Treated with dilute acid, commonly used to break down hemicellulose and improve enzymatic access.
  • D. LHW – Treated with Liquid Hot Water, a hydrothermal method that disrupts plant cell wall structure.
  • E. Lime – Treated with calcium hydroxide (lime), which helps in delignification and cellulose exposure.
  • F. SAA – Treated with Sulfite-Assisted Alkaline pretreatment, aimed at removing lignin and enhancing cellulose accessibility.

scale bar in the bottom right corner indicates 5 mm, providing a reference for the size and physical changes in the switchgrass samples due to each treatment. The image highlights the visual differences in texture, color, and structure among the treated and untreated samples, which are important for evaluating the effectiveness of each pretreatment method in biofuel or biochemical production processes.

Credit: Donohoe et al., 2011. Bioresour. Technol.

To summarize the methods of pretreatment, the table below shows some of these pretreatment methods and the major and minor effects on lignocellulosic biomass. All methods (AFEX, dilute acid, lime, liquid hot water, soaking aqueous ammonia, and treatment with SO2) affect increasing surface area, removing hemicellulose, and altering lignin structure. Only AFEX, lime, and SAA pretreatments remove lignin, and AFEX and SAA decrystallize cellulose.

Effects of Pretreatments of Biomass Recalcitrance
PretreatmentIncreases Accessible Surface AreaDecrystallizes CelluloseRemoves HemicelluloseRemoves LigninAlters Lignin Structure
AFEXMajor EffectMajor EffectMinor EffectMajor EffectMajor Effect
Dilute AcidMajor Effect-Major Effect-Major Effect
LimeMajor EffectNot DeterminedMinor EffectMajor EffectMajor Effect
Liquid H2OMajor EffectNot DeterminedMajor Effect-Minor Effect
SAAMajor EffectMajor EffectMinor EffectMajor EffectMajor Effect
SO2Major Effect-Major Effect-Minor Effect
Credit: Mosier et al., 2005. Bioresour. Technol., 96: 673-686

This table shows the conditions for ideal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for dilute acid, steam explosion, AFEX, and liquid hot water.

Comparison of Pretreatment Processesa
Pretreatment ProcessDilute AcidSteam ExplosionAFEXLiquid Hot Water
Reactive FiberYesYesYesYes
Particle Size Reduction RequiredYesNoNobNo
Hydrolyzate InhibitoryYesYesNoSlightly
Pentose RecoveryModerateLowHighHigh
Low-Cost Materials of ConstructionNoYesYesYes
Production of Process ResiduesYesNoNoNo
Potential for Process SimplicityModerateHighModerateHigh
Effectiveness at Low Moisture ContentsModerateHighVery High

Not Known

a Modified from (86); AFEX ratings from Bruce Dale (personal communication).

b For grasses, data for wood not available.

Credit: Lynd, 1996. Annual Rev. Energy Environ., 21: 403-465