Seawater Desalination (SWRO)

Seawater Desalination (SWRO) jls164

As you may remember from Module 1, the majority of Earth’s accessible water (i.e. not including a large amount of water trapped in minerals in the Earth’s interior!) is in the Oceans. In a sense, the Oceans would provide an unlimited supply of water, but of course, they are too salty to drink or use for most purposes. To use seawater for industrial, agricultural, or domestic/municipal supply, therefore, requires the separation of the water from the dissolved ions (mainly Na, Cl, Mg, SO4, Ca, and CO3). This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, but most commonly is done via either:

  1. Distillation, in which the water is forced to evaporate and then collected, leaving behind a concentrated brine, or
  2. Reverse osmosis, in which the water is forced through a semi-permeable membrane under pressure; the membrane physically excludes dissolved ions and other compounds, and only allows H2O molecules to pass (Figures 1 and 2).

Of these, reverse osmosis (or seawater reverse osmosis, SWRO) has emerged as the more efficient approach, especially when scaled to produce the millions of gallons per day or more needed to meet the demands of even modest population centers.

Of course, removing the salt from seawater requires energy – and money. For that reason, it has been a subject of intense research and engineering efforts, in order to reduce costs through increased scale, improved efficiency, pre-filtration, and improved materials (most importantly, advances in membrane materials that require less pressure to push the water through but still exclude dissolved ions). Early desalination plants were restricted to a relatively small scale, and mainly in desert areas (e.g., the Middle East), or to meet water quality requirements for the CO river treaty of 1944 (e.g., the Yuma desalination plant in Yuma, AZ, brought online in 1997). However, with improving efficiency, increasing demand, and perhaps spurred by drought, desalination is now emerging as one potential viable solution, at least in areas with access to the ocean, and the economic resources to construct and operate the plants.

Desalination plant. See image caption for description.
Figure 1. Photo of a desalination plant. Blue cylindrical coils in the background are reverse osmosis membranes wrapped around pipes that force the water outward under pressure.
Source: James Grellier (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 or GFDL], via Wikimedia Commons
Tampa Bay seawater desalination plant porcess diagram at 25 mgd production. See text description below
Initial Chemical treatment with initial solids removal to traveling screens with filter out shells, wood, and other debris greater than ¼ inch. Then particle settlement: heavier solids are settled and removed from the water, then smaller solids are filtered from the water through sand filters, a diatomaceous earth filter is used next to remove microscopic materials. Any water removed from solids is recycled. Water is then transferred to cartridge filters which are in place to protect reverse osmosis membranes. It then goes through two passes of the reverse osmosis process where the water is put under high pressure and pumped through ¬¬sacks housing reverse osmosis membranes to remove the salt. It then goes to post-treatment and a holding tank.
Source: Tampa Bay Water and appears on NOAA

SWRO and Energy Costs

SWRO and Energy Costs azs2

Technological advances, coupled with innovative approaches to reduce energy costs (i.e. by using solar, tidal, or ocean thermal energy) have helped to make SWRO a potential solution to water supply or hedge against climate change for large cities like Perth - rather than simply a novelty for wealthy countries. In the 1970s, SWRO costs hovered around $2.50/m3. Currently, costs for the most efficient plants are well below $1/m3, or between ~$1000-2000 per acre-foot (Figures 3 and 4). This is still more expensive than imported surface water or groundwater in most areas (these costs range from $400-1000/acre-foot, depending on location), but in the realm of viability for areas without those sources, or to augment limited supply. The total costs include everything from construction costs for the facility (amortized over its expected lifespan), land access, permitting for discharge and intakes, and operation & maintenance.

Despite its promise, it remains to be seen if SWRO will be a universal or large scale answer to water scarcity. In particular, key challenges include the (still relatively high) costs and associated energy demand; management of the environmental impact associated with intakes and disposal of the brine waste stream; delivery of SWRO water to regions away from the coast; and the up-scaling that would be necessary to meet demand for irrigation or industrial use.

see text desciption
Reductions in Energy Required for SWRO (1970-2008)
Year Power Consumption (kWh/m3)
1970 16
1980 8
1990 5
2000 ~3
2004 2
2008 ~2
Source: Seawater Desalination: Can it Become a Significant Lever to Reduce Water Shortage? Figure used by permission of the Pacific Institute.
Graph illustrating the dollar/cubic meter of SWRO generated water.
Reductions in the cost of SWRO-generated water since 1982, showing the proportion of cost associated with capital expenditure
Year Electric Maintenance Capex Charges Total
1982 0.7 0.2 0.6 1.5
1992 0.6 0.15 0.4 1.15
2002 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.7
2010 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.75
Source: Seawater Desalination: Can it Become a Significant Lever to Reduce Water Shortage? Figure used by permission of the Pacific Institute.

Activate Your Learning

Current water rates (cost for the consumer) in Las Vegas are $1.16 per 1000 gallons. From the data shown in Figure 4, calculate the typical cost of SWRO per 1000 gallons for 2010. Do the same for 1982. How much higher are SWRO costs than current water rates in Las Vegas for the two cases (i.e. are they double the cost? Triple? Ten times?). (Hint: You’ll need to convert between m3 and gallons: one m3 is equivalent to 264 gallons.

1982: $1.55/m3 x 1m3/264 gallons = $0.0059/gallon x 1000 gallons = $5.90/1000gal. This is about 5 times the cost of typical water delivery in Las Vegas.

2010: $0.93/m3 x 1m3/264 gallons = $0.0035/gallon x 1000 gallons = $3.50/1000gal. This is about 3 times the cost of typical water delivery.