Module 9: Climate Change and Food Supply

Module 9: Climate Change and Food Supply jls164

Video: Earth 103 Food Systems Module (1:25)

Earth 103 Food Systems Module

TIM BRALOWER: Good morning. You can't talk about food supply without talking about population. When many of you were born, global population stood at about 5 billion people. By the middle part of this century, the population will rise to about 9 billion people. And that's an astonishing increase, and the increase in population will surely impact food supply. It's really hard standing here in the middle of a cornfield in rural Pennsylvania to think that there are hungry people everywhere, and there are hungry people just a few miles away from where I'm standing. The main issue with the food supply that we'll discuss in this module is how climate change will impact it into the middle part of the century.

And there's nowhere more devastating than sub-Saharan Africa, where drought and increased temperature will impact food supply and the ability of countries to feed people. The main thing that I really worry about with food supply is the ethical issue. The countries that are emitting the most CO2 into the atmosphere-- the United States in particular-- is a country that can feed its people if it tries to, whereas those countries that are not emitting as much CO2 into the atmosphere are the countries that are going to be impacted by food supply issues in the most devastating way into the middle part of this century.

Credit: ​Dutton Institute. Earth 103 Food Systems Module. YouTube. August 16, 2013.

Introduction

Locusts, a group of swarming grasshoppers, are legendary pests. Plagues of locusts that demolished crops are described in the Bible and Quran; more recently, such plagues have occurred episodically in North Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere. And research suggests that climate change may make such plagues even more frequent in the future. Locusts include species of grasshoppers that have solitary and swarming phases in their life cycle. Research indicates that swarming occurs when the density of locusts is elevated. Swarms can include billions or even trillions of individuals and each locust can fly as far as 500 km and eat the equivalent of their own weight in a day. A single swarm can eat enough food for 2,500 people in one day! Locusts, especially the desert locust of North Africa, have been known to completely demolish crops, and the only strategy is to hold populations in check with pesticides. There is evidence that swarms develop best when unusually wet weather is followed by prolonged warm conditions. The wet phase, which causes lush vegetation to grow, allows for prolific reproduction, and the warm phase enhances the gregarious, swarming behavior. Since climate change will cause more frequent intervals of elevated precipitation and heat waves, plagues may be more frequent, more populous in places such as North Africa, Southern Europe, the Middle East, China, and Australia. Such massive and unrelenting plagues will be difficult to control with pesticides.

Hundreds of thousands of locusts in the desert make it difficult to see buildings a few hundred feet away.
Locust Swarms in Mauritania, West Africa.
Credit: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (Public Domain)

Insects are just one of many challenges that will make it harder and harder for humankind to receive ample nutrition. As we will show in this module, food is most definitely one of the Grand Challenges of the 21st Century, and feeding the increasing global population will require a very different approach to the production and distribution of crops and other sources of nutrition. Climate change will make matters increasingly difficult, in particular in regions where food shortages already exist.

Goals and Learning Outcomes

Goals and Learning Outcomes jls164

Goals

On completing this module, students are expected to be able to:

  • describe the impact of climate and other anthropogenic changes on different sources of food;
  • predict how climate change and changing land use will impact food supply in different regions;
  • project how trends in global population will impact supply of food in different parts of the globe;
  • propose strategies to cope with an increasingly hungry planet.

Learning Outcomes

After completing this module, students should be able to answer the following questions:

  • How variable are projections for global population increase in the next century, and what is the cause of the uncertainty?
  • What are Thomas Malthus’ predictions and why they are largely right?
  • What are the projections of climate change on food supply of different regions and developing versus developed world?
  • What are the causes and magnitude of famines in the past?
  • What are the impacts of projected changes in different climatic and other variables (temperature, heat waves, precipitation, drought, CO2, ozone) on food supply?
  • What are the projected climate change impacts on food production in North America?
  • What are the projected changes in production by subsistence and smallholder agriculture, crops, pasture and livestock farms?
  • What are the problems facing fisheries, and how will fisheries change in the future?
  • What are the projections for insect pests and weeds and their impacts on agriculture?
  • What are the advantages of biofuels as an energy source, and what are the ethical and environmental problems?
  • What methods can be used to adapt to changing climate?
  • What are the causes of food security issues?

Assignments Roadmap

Assignments Roadmap jls164

Below is an overview of your assignments for this module. The list is intended to prepare you for the module and help you to plan your time.

Assignments

  1. Take the Module 9 Quiz.
  2. Yellowdig Entry and Reply

 

Future Population Increase and its Impact on Food Supply

Future Population Increase and its Impact on Food Supply jls164

Earth is becoming increasingly crowded. Global population stands at just over 8 billion and is rising by 78 million people per year. Now, if that number does not sound like a lot to you, think about it this way--we are adding close to the population of Germany every year to our crowded planet! Currently, 134 million children are born every year, that is 367 thousand per day, and there are approximately 56 million deaths per year. At this rate, the population is predicted to reach 9 billion by about 2046. It's mind-boggling to think that global population when many of you were born stood at just over 5 billion! The graph below shows the massive increase in global population as well as these scary projections. It demonstrates how global population increase has been driven by surging populations of Africa and, especially, Asia.

Graph showing United Nations population estimates for the world and different continents based on differing fertility assumptions
United Nations population estimates for the world and different continents are based on differing fertility assumptions. Population is shown on the y-axis and year on the x-axis. As you can see, there is a significant divergence of estimates especially in Asia starting in about 2030 due to uncertainties associated with fertility and mortality.

The video below portrays the recent growth in population as well as the outlook.

Video: 7 Billion, National Geographic Magazine (2:57) This video is set to music and not narrated.

[MUSIC]

TEXT ON SCREEN: 7 billion is a big number. By the end of 2011, YOU will be one of 7 billion people living on earth. It would take 200 years just to count to 7 billion out loud. 7 billion steps would take you around the globe 133 times. In 1800, the world’s population was 1 billion.

130 years later, 1930 = 2 billion. 1960 = 3 billion. 1974 = 4 billion. 1987 = 5 billion. 1999 = 6 billion. 2011 = 7 billion. In 2045, it could be 9 billion.

About every second 5 people are born, 2 people die. In the time you’ve watched this video, our population has increased by 170 people. And nearly everywhere, we’re living longer. In 2010, the average person lived 69 years. In 1960 the average person lived 53 years.

In 2008, for the first time ever, more of us lived in cities than rural areas. Megacity = population greater than 10 million. In 1975 there were 3 megacities: Mexico. Tokyo, and New York City. Right now there are 21 megacities. By 2050, 70% of us will be living in urban areas but… we don’t take up as much space as you’d think. Standing shoulder to shoulder, all 7 billion of us would fill the city of Los Angeles.

So it’s not space we need. It’s balance. 5% of us consume 23% of the world’s energy. 13% of us don’t have clean drinking water. 38% of us lack adequate sanitation.

7 billion people, speaking more than 7,000 languages, living in 1994 countries. 7 billion reasons to think about.

In 1798, Thomas Malthus wrote An Essay on the Principle of Population. In this work, he predicted that populations of nations would be restricted by the availability of food because nations would not be able to control birth rate. The essay has been intensely debated by evolutionary biologists, economists, and many others for the last two centuries. Repeated famines around the globe generally support Malthus' hypothesis.

Regardless, we find ourselves in a position today where the world is currently not able to feed all of its inhabitants. Currently, more than one billion people are estimated to lack sufficient food, and more than twice that number do not receive adequate nutrition. This situation will likely become a lot more dire in the future. In fact, predictions for population increase diverge significantly in the later parts of the century because some models assume mass mortality due to widespread famine. To make matters worse, climate change is predicted to cause major problems to crop yields, especially in parts of the world where the population is growing the fastest. These shortages will likely lead to mass migration of huge numbers of people, possibly entire nations.

A large settlement of makeshift huts in a desert landscape with people walking between them.
Darfur refugee camp in Chad

Agriculture is an essential part of every society. Forty percent of the Earth’s surface is managed for cropland and pasture. That is more than for any other activity including forestry, which comprises 30% of Earth's area. In underdeveloped countries, approximately 70% of the population live in rural areas where agriculture is the major activity. There are many diverse sources of food, and populations around the world have very different diets and demands. In addition to crop and livestock, fish is a stable diet in many countries. Projections for climate change differ significantly for these various food sources, thus we will discuss them separately. For crop farming, in particular, the impact of climate change is very different for agro-businesses run by multinational corporations in the developed nations than for family-operated farms in the developing world.

Family Farming

Climate change will have very different impacts on different continents, and socio-economic factors will govern the abilities of nations to respond. Even though the south-central and southwestern US are likely to face extreme drought in the coming decades, inhabitants and businesses should by and large be able to adapt. It will be a starkly different situation in Southern Africa, India and Southeast Asia, Mexico, northeast Brazil, southern Africa, and West Africa, where climate change will be coupled with a general lack of coping mechanisms. In all of these regions, the impact of climate change, and the inability of societies to fully cope with it will potentially result in security issues including soaring food prices and military conflicts.

Food shortages will not be a new problem in many places. Mass migrations driven by food supply have been an important part of human evolution and a tragic part of the history of many nations, especially those in Africa. As we saw in Module 2, famine caused by drought is thought to have caused the collapse of the Mayan civilization in Central America around 850 AD. More recently in China, famine in the late part of the 19th century caused the death of some 60 million people. Famine is possible even in the developed world. The Irish potato famine between 1845 and 1852 caused by a potato disease called potato blight led to approximately 1 million deaths, between 20 and 25% of the population of that country. This problem does not appear to be improving with time. In the 20th century, 70 million people are thought to have died during famines: 30 million alone in China between 1958 and 1961, and 7-10 million in India in 1943.

Refugees in Mozambique
Mozambique

Nowhere is the history of famine more devastating than in Africa. Famines on the African continent, like elsewhere, have often resulted from a combination of drought and political conflicts, oppressive military regimes, and war. Most recently, the conflict in the Darfur region of Sudan erupted over water in 2003. One side of the conflict, consisting of migratory farmers, has displaced large numbers of sedentary farmers to parts of the country without sufficient food and water. Mass mortality has largely been caused by disease. Estimates of the number of dead are uncertain, but are between 180,000 and 460,000. This number is much less than the number of mortalities in the Biafran conflict of Nigeria between 1967 and 1970 when nearly a million people died from conflict and starvation. Today, more than a third of Africans suffer from hunger.

Very thin children during the Biafran conflict
Children during the Biafran conflict, Nigeria

The following video portrays the tragic history of famines.

Video: Famines throughout the ages: 19th-21st Century Pt. 2 of 2 (10:14) Set to music.This video is not narrated.

Famines Throughout the Ages: 19th-21st Century, Part 2 of 2

Famines throughout the Ages: 19th Century to Present Day. Is your country at risk?

19th century

1800-1801 famine in Ireland. Four famines - in 1810, 1811, 1846, and 1849 - in China claimed nearly 45 million lives. 1811-1812 famine devastated Madrid, taking nearly 20,000 lives. 1815 eruption of Tambora, Indonesia. Tens of thousands died of subsequent famine. 1816-1817 famine in Europe (Year Without a Summer). 1830 famine killed almost half the population of the Cape Verde Islands. 1830’s Tenpo famine. 1835 famine in Egypt killed 200,000. 1844-1846 famine in Belgium. 1845-1857 Highland Potato Famine in Scotland in result 2 million Scots emigrated. 1845-1849 Great Irish Famine killed more than 1 million people.1846 famine led to the peasant revolt known as “Maria da Fonte” in the north of Portugal. 1850-1873 as a result of Taiping Rebellion, drought, and famine, the population of China drop by over 60 million people. 1866 Orissa famine in India; one million perished. 1866-1868 Famine in Finland. About 15% of the entire population died. 1869 Rajputana famine in India; one million and a half perish. 1879 Famine in Ireland. 1870-1871 famine in Persia is believed to have caused the death of 2 million persons. 1873-1874 famine in Anatolia. All mortality avoided in Bihar famine of 1873 -74 in India (This is a success story). 1876-1879 ENSO Famine in India, China, Brazil, Northern Africa (and other countries). Famine in northern China killed 13 million people. 5.25 million die in the Great Famine of 1876-78 in India. 1878-1880 famine in St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. 1888 famine in Sudan. 1888-1892 Ethiopian Great famine. About one-third of the population died. Conditions worsen with cholera outbreaks (1889-92), a typos epidemic, and a major smallpox epidemic (1889-90). 1891-1892 famine in Russia caused 375,000 to 500,000 deaths. 1896-1897 ENSO Famine in northern China leading in part to the Boxer Rebellion. 1896-1902 ENSO Famine in India.

20th Century

1906, 1911 famines in Russia. 1907, 1911 famines in east-central China. 1914-1918 Mount Lebanon famine during World War I which killed about a third of the population. 1914-1918 famine in Belgium.

Food as a weapon. Ukraine was the wheat growing bread basket of Europe. But in 1932, when the mostly Christian Ukranians planned independence from the brutal communist regime of the Soviet Union, the ruling Jewish Bolsheviks, headed by dictator Josef Stalin, sent in the Red Army to confiscate and lock away their grain. Ukraine borders were then sealed. No food could get in, and no one could escape. Unspeakable horror followed. In the two years of this man-made famine, 10 million people and their animals starved to death in inhuman suffering. Stalin made films convincing the outside world all was fine in the Ukraine. The 20-30 million starved and shot, ended the revolution. Only now is this Zionist-inspired genocide talked about. Food as a weapon. It still happens.

1915-1916 Armenian Genocide. Armenian deportees starved to death. 1916-1917 famine caused by the British blockade of Germany in WWI. 1916-1917 winter famine in Russia. 1917-1919 famine in Persia. As much as 1/4 of the population living in the north of Iran died in the famine. 1917-1921 a series of famines in Turkestan at the time of the Bolshevik revolution killed about a sixth of the population. 1921 famine in Russia killed 5 million. 1921-1922 famine in Tatarstan. Some people in Russia were so hungry they ate their own children. 1921-1922 famine in Volga German colonies in Russia. One-third of the entire population perished. 192801929 famine in northern China. The drought resulted in 3 million deaths. 1928-1929 famine in Ruanda-Burundi, causing large migrations to the Congo. 1932-1933 Soviet famine in Ukraine (Holdomor), some parts of Russia and North Caucaus area. 2.6 to 10 million people may have died. Six million perish in Soviet famine. Peasant’s crops seized, they and their animals starve. 1932-1933 famine in Kazakhstan killed 1.2-1.5 million. 1936 famine in China, with an estimated 5 million fatalities. 1940-1943 famine in Warsaw Ghetto. 1941-44 Leningrad famine caused by a 900-day blockade by German troops. About one million Leningrad residents starved, froze, or were bombed to death in the winter of 1941-42, when supply routes to the city were cut off & temperatures dropped. 1941-44 famine in Greece caused by the Axis occupation. An estimated 300,000 people perished. 1942-1943 famine killed one million in China. 1943 famine in Bengal. 1943 famine in Ruanda-Urundi, causing migrations to the Congo. 1944 famine in the Netherlands during World War II, more than 20,000 deaths. 1945 famine in Vietnam. 1946-47 famine in Soviet Union killed 1-1/5 million. 1958 famine in Tigray, Ethiopia, claimed 100,000 lives. 1959-1961 Great Leap Forward/The Great Chinese Famine (China). The official statistic is 20 million deaths, as given by Hu Yaobang. 1965-1967 drought in India responsible for 1.5 million deaths. 1967-1970 Biafran Faine caused by Nigerian blockade. Life: Starving Children of Biara war. 1968-1972 Sahel drought created a famine that killed a million people. 1973 famine in Ethiopia; failure of the government to handle this crisis led to fall of Haile Selassie and to Derg rule. 1974 famine in Bangladesh. 1975-1979 Khmer Rouge. An estimated 2 million Cambodians lost their lives to murder, forced labor, and famine. 1980 famine in Karamoja, Uganda. 1984 famine in Ethiopia. 1991-1993 Somalian famine. 1996 North Korean famine. Scholars estimate 600,000 died of starvation (other estimates range from 200,000 to 3.5 million). 1993 famine in Sudan caused by water and drought.

Pulitzer 1994 Kevin Carter
The PHOTO in the mud is the “Pulitzer Prize” winning photo taken in 1994, during the Sudan famine. The picture depicts a famine-stricken child crawling towards an United Nations food camp, located a kilometer away. The vulture is waiting for the child to die so that it can eat it. This picture shocked the whole world. No one knows what happened to the child, including the photographer Kevin Carter who left the place as soon as the photograph was taken. Three months later he committed suicide due to depression.

1998 ENSO Famine in Northeaster Brazil. 1998-2000 famine in Ethiopia. The situation worsened by Eritrean-Ethiopian War. 1998-2004 Second Congo War. 3.8 million people died, mostly from starvation and disease. 2000-2009 Zimbabwe’s food crisis caused by Mugabe’s land reform policies.

21st Century

2003 famine in Sudan/Darfur (Darfur conflict). 2005 Malawi food crisis. 2005-06 Niger food crisis. 2006 Horn of Africa food crisis. 2008-Myanmar food crisis. The Cyclone Nargis devastated Burma’s major rice-producing region. 2008-North Korean famine. 2008-Horn of Africa food crisis. 2008 Afghanistan food crisis. 2008-Bangladesh food crisis. 2008 East Africa food crisis. 2008 Tajikistan food crisis. 2009 Kenya food crisis. 10 million Kenyans face starvation. How much confidence do you have in your flood suppliers? Most of the people in this country have no idea what it takes to put food on their table. What does it take? What’s wrong with the bees? If you want to grow fruits vegetables or nuts on a commercial basis in the United States, you need to have soil. Sun seeds water and honeybees. Millions and millions of honeybees trucked in from all over the country to pollinate the crops. On average, Hackenberg and his bees log 60,000 miles a year on the road wintering in Florida to work citrus and cantaloupe. Then back north in the spring for apples and cherries, maybe even to California for the almond crop. He's just a small part of an industry that pollinates 90 different crops worth an estimated 15 billion dollars. And most people don't even know it exists.

CCD/Colony Collapse Disorder

One documentary writer who was here and looked at these two months after I was here, described this not as bee hives, but as a graveyard with these empty white boxes with no bees left in them. Now I'm going to sum up a year's worth of work in two sentences. To say that, we have been trying to figure out what the cause of this is and what we know is that it's as if the bees have caught a flu and this flu has wiped through the population of bees. And the question that keeps us up at night is, why have the bees suddenly become so susceptible to this flu? And why are they so susceptible to these other diseases? And we don't have the answer to that yet. And we spend a lot of time trying to figure that out. If we had taken out all those ingredients the bees had indirectly or directly pollinated, we wouldn't have much on our plate. Could you grow these pumpkins without bees? It wouldn't be profitable. What happens if you have another big die-off? I'm probably out of this. If there's another big die-off of bees, some beekeepers, maybe many beekeepers, are going to go out of business. And what does that do to vegetables and fruits in the supermarket? We won't have the quality fruits. We may not have the quantity of fruits and vegetables. And this could mean higher prices at the grocery store, and it'll hit the public directly. Why is that? What does the Bible say will happen in the last days? Do you depend on commercial farming? What will happen if they go out of business? Are you growing your own foods? Or storing it? If not, you’re at risk!

Check Your Understanding

Climate Change Forecasts that Affect Food Supply

Climate Change Forecasts that Affect Food Supply jls164

A number of different physical variables impact agriculture. These include temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speed, and radiation. The absolute levels of these variables and their variability on a daily, monthly, and annual basis, affect crop yields as well as livestock health.

Crops are particularly sensitive to absolute temperature variation even over short time scales, in some cases a few hours (for extreme cold) and days (for warmth). Likewise, extreme events such as floods, and inter-annual variations in rainfall connected with cycles such as ENSO can also impact crops significantly. For example, the major drought in Australia from 1998-2010 led to significantly lower crop yields. Major cold snaps in Florida in 1983 and 1985 killed a third of all citrus trees, with an accompanying loss of $2 billion. At the other end of the spectrum, the North Atlantic Oscillation has caused sunnier summers in Britain, leading to increased wheat yields.

As it turns out, anthropogenic impacts can greatly magnify the effects of climate change on crops, livestock, and fisheries. For example, soil erosion, overgrazing, air pollution, salinization of groundwater, and pests and overuse of pesticides tend to exacerbate the impacts of the changing climate such as droughts and heatwaves. Here, we describe the forecasts and impacts of changes in climate variables, followed by anthropogenic changes.

Human impacts on crops

Temperature and Heat Waves

Temperature and Heat Waves ksc17

Model forecasts under SRES A1B and A2 are for 2-4oC warming by 2100 with the most significant increase in high-latitude regions. In addition, the forecasts indicate a much higher likelihood of heat waves in the future. As it turns out, an increase in average temperature can have a positive impact on agriculture, lengthening the growing season in regions with cool spring and fall seasons. Regional and global simulations allow predictions of temperature increase on crop yield. The results (see figure below) show that modest temperature increases produce increased yields for some crops. Warming will also lead to a decrease in the occurrence of severe winter cold stress on crops, causing a pole-ward shift in the feasibility of regions for agricultural activities. This is especially important for high-yield tropical crops such as rice. Warming will have a greater impact in the Northern Hemisphere, where there is more cultivated area in high latitude areas.

Map illustrating how climate change will depress agricultural yields in most countries in 2050, given current agricultural practices and crop varieties.
Projected change in crop yields as a result of climate change. The map shows regions that will see declining yields (in red) and those with increasing yields (in green). This analysis is based on a mean of various emission scenarios and output of a number of different crops.

However, warming ultimately reaches a limit where yield curves start to decrease for all crops. Globally, this threshold is reached at temperature increases over about 3oC. Crop yields also decline precipitously at temperatures above 30oC; although plants develop faster in warm temperatures, photosynthesis has a temperature optimum in the range of 20° to 25°C, and, above this range, plants have less time to accumulate carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. Because individual plants cannot move, they have developed mechanisms that allow them to tolerate higher temperatures and adapt to changing soil conditions. These mechanisms include the production of proteins that lessen heat-shock, as well as the ability to conduct photosynthesis during periods of heat. Such adaptations will partially determine where a crop can survive the impact of climate change.

A farmer ploughs through hardened soil on a rain-dependent rice field in a rural Ciampea, a district West of Bogor regency in Indonesia.
Wilted crops in Indonesia as a result of drought.

Warming will have negative impacts on crop yield in regions where summer heat limits production, and it will lead to more frequent extreme high heat stress on crops. Heat stress varies by plant but includes lack of emergence of new plant material or damage to it, water deficit as a result of high evaporation, damage to reproductive development, and death. In addition, climate change will lead to increased soil evaporation rates, which stress crops and also increase the intensity of droughts.

Heat waves are usually known for their human toll. For example, the Great Chicago heat wave of 1995 led to over 700 deaths as a result of five extremely warm and humid days with a heat index reaching 125 degrees. A prolonged heat wave in Northern Europe in 2003 killed more than 40,000 people and led to a 20 to 36% decrease in the yields of grains and fruits. Heat waves are defined differently in different places, but usually, are defined as a specific number of days over a certain temperature. Prolonged heat waves can also cause significant damage to crops and livestock, with major economic losses. In Russia, an extended heat wave in 2010 caused 50,000 deaths and a loss of 25% of the grain yield at a cost of $15 billion. In the central US, more than 6000 cattle died in the July 2011 heat wave. And the heat wave of 2012 in the same region resulted in the worst corn crop in two decades.

Dead cattle resulting from drought in Nicaragua
Dead cattle resulting from drought in Nicaragua.

Check Your Understanding

Precipitation

Precipitation ksc17

Models indicate that precipitation will increase in high latitudes including places such as Northern Europe and Canada, but decrease in most subtropical land regions, including the southern tier of states from Texas to California. Droughts will become longer and more intense in these areas. A decrease in precipitation can reduce soil moisture over the short term and increase soil erosion rates over the long term. Likewise, as we have seen, the intensity of extreme events such as cyclones and hurricanes is likely to increase, also leading to potentially more significant crop damage, and also potentially, soil erosion. Waterlogged soils can cause severe damage to root systems and limit the uptake of nutrients. Flooding can cause permanent loss of many crops. One of the most significant periods of flooding in the US took place in the Midwest in 1993 when the Mississippi and Missouri rivers flooded their banks and submerged huge areas of farmland, a total of nine million acres. The estimated crop losses during this event were $7 billion. In the 2008 Midwest floods, Iowa alone lost $4 billion in damaged crops.

Aerial view of flooding of farmland by Mississippi river in Iowa
Flooding of farmland by the Mississippi River in Iowa, 2008.

Precipitation may be crucial for determining the impact of climate on crops. Decreases in precipitation and evaporation-precipitation ratios in marginal areas that are currently entirely fed by rain may change ecosystem function to the point where irrigation is required. Estimates suggest that impact of increased evaporation will require increased irrigation requirements of 5-8% globally with higher amounts (15%) in Southeast Asia.

A key variable controlled by a combination of heat stress and rainfall is the 120-day growing period, the minimum duration required for crops such as corn to survive. Climate change has the potential to shrink the 120-day growing period, and this will greatly impact the sustainability of crop production.

Irrigation of farmland with machine spraying water on crops.
Irrigation of farmland in New Jersey.

Drought can be devastating to agriculture. During the decade-long “Federation” drought in Australia, from 1901-1903, an estimated 52 million sheep perished. In the long Dustbowl of the 1930s, over 75% of topsoil was lost in areas of Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, and crops were ruined. In fact, in many areas, agriculture never recovered from the drought, and the economic losses and human suffering are still legendary.

Man and two children in front of shack in the 1930s Dustbowl in Cimmaron County, OKlahoma
The 1930s Dustbowl in Cimarron County, Oklahoma.
Credit: Arthur Rothstein, for the Farm Security Administration from Wikimedia (Public Domain)

The following videos describe recent droughts in Texas and Australia:

Video: Texas-sized drought for Lone Star state (2:26)

Texas-sized drought for Lone Star state

CHRIS: In the South, it's not just the heat. It's the drought, which stretches from Florida all the way to Texas. CBS News correspondent Don Teague is in West Texas with more for us this morning. Don, good morning.

[COWS MOOING]

DON TEAGUE: Good morning, Chris. Texas is now in its third-worst drought in history for this time of year. Most of this state is 10 to 20 inches below normal rainfall totals. And that's hitting the cattle industry here and farmers hard.

DON TEAGUE: Third-generation farmer Henry Polansky has worked the land just north of Waco, Texas, for all of his 63 years.

HENRY POLANSKY: The crops are really hurting right now.

DON TEAGUE: He's seen droughts come and go.

HENRY POLANSKY: We rely so much on the weather.

DON TEAGUE: But the dry spell that's gripping Texas this year could prove disastrous.

DON TEAGUE: It's low here. And this corn should be over our heads?

HENRY POLANSKY: Oh, yes.

DON TEAGUE: His 520 acres of corn is struggling to grow at all.

HENRY POLANSKY: And this is all blight. It's not even going to make any seed here.

DON TEAGUE: At best, he figures his withering corn fields will only produce half of what they should this year, and that's if it rains soon.

HENRY POLANSKY: The rain will still help. But if we don't get any rain, like I said, in another couple of weeks, it's going to be over with.

DON TEAGUE: Already the drought in Texas has cost farmers and ranchers more than $1.5 billion. Neighboring states from New Mexico to Louisiana are almost as dry. And in New Orleans, thousands of trees planted in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina are at risk of dying from lack of water. But Texas is by far the worst with 92% of the states suffering severe drought conditions.

[COWS MOOING]

DON TEAGUE: Cattle ranchers are selling off their herds because there's not enough grass to feed them.

DAVID HORNIK, CATTLE RANCH HAND: It's not going to last long before everybody has to cut down real bad or even sell out completely.

DON TEAGUE: Even horses can barely find enough to graze on. And Henry Polansky, along with millions of Texans, is hoping, even praying for rain.

[COWS MOOING]

DON TEAGUE: Well, these cattle here will all be auctioned off later today, most because of this ongoing drought. The temperatures have been scorching here as well. We've already had several 100-degree days in this part of Texas. Forecasters say no rain expected here any time soon. Chris?

CHRIS: Not the news they're looking for. CBS's Don Teague in West Texas for us this morning. Don, thanks.

Credit: CBS. Texas-sized drought for Lone Star state. YouTube. June 9, 2011.

Video: Extreme Drought in Australia - BBC Science (2:42)

Extreme Drought in Australia

[MUSIC AND HELICOPTER SOUNDS]

NARRATOR: Three hours away by plane from Sydney Harbor, and a world away from the boats and waterfronts, farming communities like Bourke are living at the sharp end of global warming.

[MUSIC]

NEWS ANCHOR: Now to 2WEB's weather forecast for Bourke, New South Wales. To all our farmers listening-- unfortunately, there is no rain in the forecast this week. Six years without significant rain. Times must be tough, but hang in there. Rain has to come soon.

NARRATOR: The Thompsons have been farmers for generations. They have 2000 acres of cotton that relies on water to grow. Unfortunately, they have been stuck in the worst drought in living memory and haven't been able to grow anything for six years.

MR. THOMPSON: Normally, this time of year, the crop would be up about two feet high, just almost starting to be a solid mass of green. You know, it's almost to the stage where you'd start to struggle to see up and down the rows.

[MUSIC]

NARRATOR: And the situation gets worse when you get down the river.

FARMER: Well, we're in the bed of the mighty Darling River, which is the longest river system in Australia. As you can see, it's bone dry. To my left here is our river pumps, which is what we use to extract water out of this river for irrigation.

NARRATOR: Only 14 months ago, this arid field was a lake. The Thompsons remember the good times playing in the water.

MRS. THOMPSON: We've got a jet ski. And the kids all can ski-- and wakeboards and kneeboards. It's really good when there's water here. You get sick of seeing the dirt and the dust, and the beautiful blue skies.

MR. THOMPSON: The worst case scenario is that the drought continues on for a couple of years and the equity that we have in our farm diminishes back to not much, or to nothing, then. I guess it's a forced sale. Ugh, I'd be devastated. Yeah, I'd be totally devastated.

We started with nothing when we came here.

[DEFEATED LAUGH]

[SOBBING]

MR. THOMPSON: To have a drought that's now, I think, classified as a one in 200-year drought sort of makes me think that there's probably something else going on. And I guess the issue of global warming probably has some merit.

Credit: CBS. Extreme Drought in Australia - BBC Science. YouTube. December 20, 2008.

CO2

CO2 ksc17

All SRES emission scenarios call for CO2 levels to increase significantly over the course of the 21st century. Even with drastic actions, levels are predicted to reach 550 ppm mid-century before decreasing. Worst-case scenarios have levels continuing to rise beyond 650 ppm at the end of the century. Compared to other climate variables, increasing CO2 generally has a positive impact on crops, leading to increased crop yields (see figure below). CO2 is key to photosynthesis; the gas is what is known as a limiting nutrient for plant growth. Without a certain amount of CO2, plants will fail to grow. CO2 acts as a fertilizer for crops like rice, soybeans, and wheat and enhances growth rates. The impact of increased CO2 is only known via experiments, and they show increases in production from 5-20% at CO2 levels of 550 ppm. The key uncertainty is how realistic experiments are at predicting the real world. There is a consensus among scientists that the real changes in yield might be slightly less than those in the lab.

Nine images showing the impact of increased CO2 on production of maize, wheat, and rice
Impact of increased CO2 on production of various crops

Pollution and other Factors

Pollution and other Factors ksc17

Pollution from industry will increase tropospheric ozone levels. Ozone levels in the lower atmosphere are determined by both emissions and temperature, thus ground levels are almost certain to increase. Higher levels of ground-level ozone limit the growth of crops.

Landscape view of Ozone pollution over downtown Los Angeles, orange smog layer.
Ozone pollution over downtown Los Angeles.
Credit: US EPA (CC BY 4.0)

As with temperature and precipitation, the negative impact of increasing ozone on crops will offset the beneficial impact from elevated CO2 levels. At the same time, the ozone layer is becoming thinner in other areas, leading to increases in UV-B exposure. The future impact of ozone and UV-B on crops is not completely understood, as the increasing CO2 may possibly increase or decrease the effect. Increasing ozone and UV-B exposure can lead to reduced rates of photosynthesis and a number of other measures of crop stress, including sensitivity to drought.

Other Factors

Food production will be affected by a number of other factors, including rising sea level (see Module 10) that will swamp low-lying coastal areas that include some of the most productive areas of the world today. The potential area of crop production is also being reduced by desertification and salinization (increase in harmful salt levels in topsoil as a result of excess evaporation) as well as soil erosion over vast areas of the world. Soil erosion can result directly from climate change, for example, from increased precipitation in major storms. However, it is also a product of over-cultivation of crops and other poor agricultural practices.

People carrying water cans to water crops in a desert area of Africa.
Desertification in Africa.

Impact of climate change on North America

The impact of climate change (summarized in the figures below) on North American agriculture varies significantly by region. Projections suggest yield increases of 5-20 percent over the first decades of the century as a result of warming and higher CO2, with generally positive effects for the nation as a whole for much of the century. However, regions of the continent will be much more vulnerable than others. In particular, the Great Plains will likely face declining yields as a result of drought. Crops that are limited by growing season, for example, fruit in the northeastern US, will benefit from improved growing conditions, whereas those crops that are near their climate thresholds, for example, grapes in California (as a result of low rainfall) will likely face lower yields and poorer quality. Drought in California will likely impact the yields of numerous crops.

Maps of the U.S. showing projected temperature changes under higher and lower emissions scenarios for mid and end-century.
Projected change in temperature for the remainder of the 21st century under two emissions scenarios.
Credit: USGCRP (2009). U.S. Global Change Research Project 2009 Report (USGCRP) (Public Domain). Archived January 27, 2025. Accessed December 2, 2025. Wayback Machine.
Four seasonal maps of North America showing precipitation changes from CMIP3-A.
Projected change in precipitation in the years 2089-2099 under a high emissions scenario.
Credit: USGCRP (2009). U.S. Global Change Research Project 2009 Report (USGCRP) (Public Domain). Archived January 27, 2025. Accessed December 2, 2025. Wayback Machine.

Impact of Climate Change on Terrestrial Food Sources

Impact of Climate Change on Terrestrial Food Sources jls164

To feed the burgeoning global population, food supply is going to have to increase, but it is not going to be easy. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) predicts there will be a 55% increase in crop production from 2030 and an 80% increase by 2050 (both compared to 2000 levels). To allow for this increase, a 19% increase in rain-fed land area and a 30% increase in the area of irrigated land will be required. This areal increase will take place in developing countries, including Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Crop yields/acre are expected to rise in these countries. Even still, the rate of growth in global crop production is predicted to decline from 2.2%/year in 1970-2000 to 1.6%/year in 2000-2015, 1.3%/year from 2015 to 2030 to 0.8%/year from 2030 to 2050. Thus, producing sufficient food to feed our growing population will become increasingly challenging. Here, we discuss the different types of agricultural business and how they will change in the future.

Subsistence and smallholder agriculture

Subsistence agriculture refers to rural production in developing countries where farms are run by families, and farming provides the main source of income. Seventy-five percent of the world's 1.2 billion poor people live in rural areas. These people, with poor technology and more limited access to markets, have a much more difficult time farming than large agribusinesses. Subsistence and smallholder agriculture (SSA) is more threatened by climate change than any other type of agriculture largely because of the lack of technology and limited resources to fall back on during tough times. However, SSA is also remarkably resilient. The availability of extended family labor and indigenous knowledge can overcome significant hardship.

A field of cattle with mountains in the background and a small tent in the foreground
Subsistence farming in Iran

SSA will likely decrease in importance with the gradual migration of the population of under-developed countries from rural to urban areas. Urban population recently overtook rural population, and in rural areas, there has been a movement away from SSA to other forms of subsistence. Thus, in many areas of the world, SSA is becoming increasingly rare as a way of life.

Crops

By far, the most important source of food for humans are grains, wheat, corn, and rice. All three crops will be hit hard by heatwaves in places such as the Canadian, US and Russian heartlands which are key grain producing regions. However, wheat is likely the most susceptible crop. Wheat is a cool season crop and recent research suggests that warming over the last 50 years has resulted in a 5 percent decline in production. Climate change is projected to cause a hotter summer every other year than the hottest summer recorded, and this would cause a 25% decrease in wheat production.

Drought will impact the production of all three grains, drive up their prices, and potentially lead to famine and political unrest.

Pasture and livestock

Pasture includes both grassland and an ecosystem known as rangeland, which includes deserts, scrub, chaparral, and savannah. Grassland often occurs in semi-arid locations, such as the steppes of Central Asia and the prairies of North America. Grassland can also be found in wetter locations, for example, northwestern Europe. Rangeland is found on every continent, especially in locations where temperature and rainfall limit other vegetation types. Grassland is very sensitive to climate change because many grass species are fast growing and have short growing seasons. In the lab, increases in CO2 has been shown experimentally to decrease grassland diversity.

Prarie farm in Nebraska with irrigation sprinklers in the background
Prairie farm in Nebraska
Credit: Jan Tik from Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

As we have seen, heat stress also decreases the productivity of livestock, especially cattle, as well as fertility, and can be life-threatening. Conception rates are also particularly an issue for cattle that breed in spring and summer months. Heat stress puts a limit on dairy milk yield regardless of food consumption.

Check Your Understanding

Fisheries

Fisheries jls164

The world’s fisheries are in a state of crisis. Environmental changes and pollution combined with over-fishing and the rise of invasive species are deteriorating the health of the global fishing industry. Nothing is more symptomatic of this decline than the history of cod in the North Atlantic. Cod has long been a staple diet for societies in the region including Iceland and Scandinavia, and a century ago, they were so abundant that whole fisheries thrived on this one fish. Now, however, cod has been so overfished that conflicts over fishing rights have erupted (between Iceland and England in the 1950s to 1970s, dubbed the "cod wars") and populations have plummeted. The same countries that depleted the stock of cod are now overfishing other species, including haddock and skate.

All of this comes at a time of growing consumption of fish. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts that global fish production will increase from 2012 to 2020, but not as rapidly as will demand. Wild fish will comprise the majority of fish caught in sub-Saharan Africa and the US, but in other parts of the world, aquaculture will increase in importance. It could be that aquaculture or fish farming will dominate fisheries by the end of the century. However, aquaculture has its own set of issues. For carnivorous fish such as salmon, fish farming utilizes a considerable supply of feeder fish. Moreover, fish farms are at a significant risk of environmental problems and are susceptible to outbreaks of disease.

The superb overview of the state of the modern ocean by Jeremy Jackson identifies several distinct habitats and ecosystems that are in a significant state of decline:

Colony of sea urchins in shallow water
Sea urchins often colonize the ocean floor where other organisms have been depleted by pollution or other factors
Credit: nickyfern from Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
  • One of the richest habitats for fish are forests made up of giant seaweed called kelp. Overfishing has led to the removal of the predators of herbivores such as sea urchins that consume kelp, and this had caused a drastic reduction in the area of this key habitat, especially in the Northern Hemisphere.
  • Seagrass beds are another key habitat, especially in tropical and subtropical lagoons and bays and on continental shelves. These beds are vital habitats for manatees, sea turtles, rays, and sharks as well as invertebrates such as oysters. The area of seagrass beds has declined by about 30% since 1980 due to nutrients in sewage and run-off from agricultural areas.

Healthy and unhealthy seagrass bed

Man on boat looking into sea with an enormous amount of fish in fishing nets.
Overharvesting of fisheries in Chile
Credit: C. Ortiz Rojas from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)
  • On the coast and over the continental shelf, commercial overfishing has depleted ecosystems and destroyed habitats over large swaths of coastline and further out on the continental shelves. Fishing using trawling nets has depleted fish stocks as well as shellfish beds. The total loss of biomass has been enormous, and a number of large fish species are now absent from these environments.
  • Pollution of the coastal environment has led to eutrophication and red tides of toxic dinoflagellates (see Module 7). This has caused significant problems for coastal fisheries around the world. On top of this, introduction of species such as lionfish, which come from home aquariums and are fierce predators of other fish, have often turned out to be invasive.
Hundreds of dead fish on the shore in Rhode Island
Fish kill in Rhode Island as a result of hypoxia.
  • We have documented the decline to coral reef ecosystems in Module 7. Destruction of reef tracts, due to physical damage, pollution, and bleaching, has led to the loss of habitats for many species of fish and invertebrates. As we saw in Module 7, algae are taking over many areas of modern reefs.
  • Phytoplankton at the base of the marine food chain are also suffering. Some estimates suggest a 40% reduction in phytoplankton production since the 1950s. Such a scale is certain to have an impact on all marine food webs.

As a result of all of these changes, over 100 species of fish are currently on the extinction watch list. Estimates suggest that biomass produced by fish has declined by more than 50% in the last 40 years. Some scientists are warning of a complete collapse of marine fisheries by 2050, which would be a devastating problem for communities that rely on fish as the major source of food.

The following video describes the stark future of global fisheries as a result of overfishing:

Video: Overfishing - The consequences (2:34) This video is set to music and not narrated.

Overfishing

[MUSIC]

TEXT ON SCREEN: For every pound [of seafood] that goes to market, more than 10 pounds, even 100, may be thrown away as by-catch.  Sylvia Earle

90% of large predatory fish such as tuna, swordfish, sharks, are now gone.

90% of large whales, 60% of the small ones are also now gone from estuaries and coastal waters. 100 million sharks are killed every year. 100,000 albatross are killed every year while fishing!

A study done by the Dalhousie University of Canada projects that by 2048 all the species that we fish today will be extinct. That is in 38 years.

So, aside from those of us who enjoy the occasional salmon sashimi, spicy tuna rolls, salted grouper, or pan roasted Chilean sea bass, why should humanity care about the extinction of these species? We are destroying a food chain system kept in balance by evolution through millennia. There will be no big fish to eat the medium fish. And too many medium fish to eat all the small fish. And then there is no one to eat the really small organisms: the plankton, the algae, etc.

The result, slime: shorthand for the increasingly frequent appearance of dead zones, red tides, and jellyfish that, when they die out, sink to the bottom of the ocean to mix with dissolved oxygen while they rot. Nothing can live in these oxygen-depleted waters, except… bacteria. So it’s like we are getting rid of the complex, sophisticated organisms that took millions and millions of years to develop.

And… replacing them with the most basic ones. Not the wisest of evolutionary strategists, are we?

Green Forum Oceans
abc planet

Credit: Hayley B. Overfishing - The consequences. YouTube. September 10, 2009.

Check Your Understanding

Weeds, Diseases, and Insect Pests

Weeds, Diseases, and Insect Pests jls164

In the US and Canada, warming trends have led to earlier spring activity of insects. Down the road, entomologists predict that many species of insects may thrive on a warmer planet, and populations may explode. This is because research shows that insects that are adapted to warmer climates have faster population growth rates. Insect species generally have short life cycles, fast and prolific reproduction and rapid mobility, thus warming can readily result in massive increases in populations.

Insects have a number of responses to warming. Some species may avoid warmer temperatures by moving to cooler regions. Others may adapt to warmer climates by changing their biochemistry or their behavior. Of course, some insects may not adapt at all and disappear, but those that can adapt will thrive in warmer environments. In general, insects are expected to benefit most in mid and high latitudes. For example, in Alaska and Siberia, longer summers are already producing demographic explosions in defoliating and wood-eating insects that have led to the devastation of thousands of forest acres and millions of dollars in damage. In the future, it is certain that other groups of insects, locusts, and many others will cause even more significant losses for crops across the globe.

Parasitic wasp on a caterpillar
Parasitic wasp on a caterpillar. The white silky cocoons contain the grubs of the wasp.These wasps actually are beneficial, killing many other insect parasites.

The research on weeds and climate change is a little more complicated. Some weeds are not expected to thrive with higher CO2 levels. These are weeds that belong to the C4 plant groups that typically do well under lower CO2 conditions. However, some of the most invasive weeds belong to the C3 plant groups. These include Canada thistle, star thistle, quackgrass, lambsquarter, and spotted knapweed. In addition, the use of herbicides to control weeds is potentially problematic at high CO2 levels.Experiments suggest that certain weeds become tolerant to chemicals such as Roundup at high CO2 concentrations.

Field of broccoli overtaken by the Canada thistle, an invasive perennial weed
Canada thistle, an invasive perennial weed.

Check Your Understanding

Biofuels

Biofuels jls164

Biofuels are fuels that derive their energy from biological carbon fixation via photosynthesis. Biofuel sources include a whole variety of plants such as corn, sugar cane, soybeans, sunflowers, maize as well as aquatic algae. The most common compounds used to make fuels are sugars, starch and vegetable oil. A wide variety of fuel types are included under the biofuel umbrella including bioalcohol (most often known as bioethanol), biodiesel, vegetable oil, and solid biofuel. Biofuels were recently considered a vital part of the world's future energy portfolio, and the most compelling argument for their production in the US was energy independence and the low of cost production. Recently, however, traditional biofuels have fallen somewhat out of favor, partly as a result of environmental and ethical concerns, and partly due to the surge of natural gas production.

Two Environmental scientists in a field with biofuel crops.
Environmental scientists at Argonne National Laboratory study potential biofuel crops.

Biofuels are a very complicated and constantly evolving issue as research on them intensifies and the global energy portfolio changes. Research is being directed at fuel production, for example, the development of fuels that produce the most energy and the least land area to grow. However, the key ethical issue is that the production of biofuels uses land that could also be used to grow crops to feed people. In Brazil, which is the world's second-largest producer of bioethanol, large agribusinesses are devoted to its production. However, subsistence farmers often make more money producing biofuels than crops for food, and this has led to a loss in land area for producing crops for consumption. In addition, deforestation to develop acreage for biofuel production helps to accelerate climate change. Finally, the use of agricultural land to produce biofuels has the potential to drive up the price of food.

These ethical issues are forcing the biofuel industry as well as governments around the world to invest in research into fuels that are ethically acceptable. If biofuels are to be an accepted part of our energy future, fuel sources must be developed that require less land area and less water per unit of energy. Alternatively, fuel such as cellulosic ethanol can be produced from crops or waste products that cannot be consumed; other potential fuel sources include aquatic algae and agricultural or human waste.

Plant in New Zealand that converts algae to biofuel. A series of rectangular under an overcast sky.
Plant in New Zealand that converts algae to biofuel

The following video describes the advantages and disadvantages of biofuels. Please note that the video must be watch on YouTube, so click the Watch on YouTube link.

Biofuels - the Green alternative (2:04)

Biofuels - the Green alternative

SPEAKER: The EU, like most of the world, needs to reduce its dependence on oil and gas. By 2020, it wants 10% of energy used in the transport sector to come from renewable sources. In order to meet this target, manufacturers have been developing cars which run on alternative fuels such as electricity and biofuels. Biofuels are byproducts of industrial waste. For example, gases, alcohols, organic compounds, and oils. They originally come from vegetable or animal matter.

There are two main types of so-called first-generation biofuels. Biodiesels made, for example, from rapeseed, sunflower, or soybean oil; and bioethanol, produced from plants such as sugar beet, sugar cane, cereal crops, wheat or maize, and blended with diesel. The advantage of this alternative energy source, it helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The drawback, its production can have damaging environmental consequences, such as water pollution, deforestation, and change of land use. For example, farmland traditionally used to grow crops for food supply is often being diverted for biofuels production. This was one of the triggers of the 2007-2008 world food price crisis.

To counter the problem, researchers are developing ways of replacing current biofuel production methods with so-called second generation processes, using what is known as biomass, organic waste, wood chippings, straw, and hay. This reduces the impact on the food chain, but is a more complicated process, requiring sophisticated technology. The semi-chemical route involves producing combustible gas or liquids, such as diesel or jet fuel. The biochemical method typically uses the cellulose found in plants to ferment ethanol.

In the future, researchers also hope to produce biofuels from microalgae and microorganisms

Credit: AFP News Agency. Biofuels - the Green alternative. YouTube. May 3, 2012.

Adaptation

Adaptation jls164

Agriculture in developed countries is less likely to be vulnerable to climate change than in developing nations. In both places, the impact will depend on the nature of the climate changes, as well as the ability of agriculture to adapt through technological advances and changing food demand. For example, the management of water resources (see Module 8) will be critical for agriculture in arid and sub-arid environments facing increasing drought. Advanced soil management and crop rotations can also help maintain healthy soil conditions. In the following, we describe a menu of adaptation strategies that have the potential to maintain and increase food production over the coming decades.

Adaptation Strategies for Food Production

  • Green farming: A number of environmentally friendly approaches have been very effective in Asia and Africa. These include the biological control of major insect pests, the development of hardy rice varieties, and drought and parasitic-weed-resistant crops.
hydroponic tomatoes (i.e. grown in water with no soil) growing in a greenhouse.
Hydroponic (i.e. grown in water with no soil) tomatoes.
Credit: Jeff Couturier from Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
  • Genetically modified crops (GMC) have been produced on over 300 million acres in 25 countries, more than half of which were in the developing world. GMC include crops that are insect resistant, herbicide, and drought tolerant. Proponents argue that GMCs increase productivity and reduce the need for pesticides, herbicides, and tilling. Nevertheless, environmentalists and others are concerned that GMCs may carry health risks. There have been no incidents in 13 years of production; however, this may be too short for health effects to emerge.
Genetically modified cooking tomatoes in France
Genetically modified tomatoes
  • Precision agriculture is the application of satellite data, geographic information systems and microcomputers to manage a variety of information including soil and crop conditions, application of fertilizers and irrigation, and the automated operation of machinery. These techniques have been applied in a variety of developed and underdeveloped countries in vineyards, vegetable and fruit farms, general crops, and pasture management for livestock.
Map of precision agriculture in Saudi Arabia; note highly regular orientation of fields
Precision agriculture in Saudi Arabia; note the highly regular orientation of fields.
  • Sustainable intensification is the production of more food from the same area of land while reducing the environmental impacts. This includes a combination of techniques that optimize output for example through reduced tillage, contour farming, mulching, and cover crops, and technologies to apply water, nutrients, and pesticides only where they are needed. In addition, the integration of management of pests for different crops, the management of livestock waste and the planting of forests can all be used to offset greenhouse gases.
large planting of lettuce in Korea, an example of sustainable intensification in farming.
A large crop of lettuce in Korea is an example of sustainable intensification in farming.
Credit: Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)
  • Reducing Waste. In many parts of the world, considerable waste results from the inadequacy of storage techniques. Estimates suggest that 30-40% of food globally is lost to waste. In underdeveloped countries, decreasing this waste will require investment in cold storage facilities along with improved supply-chain management.
  • Changing Diets. The demand for meat and dairy products has increased rapidly over the last 50 years, driven largely by counties such as India and China, resulting in a 1.5 times increase in the number of cattle, sheep, and goats, a 2.5 times increase in the number of pigs, and a 4.5 times increase in the number of chickens grown for their products. All of these animals require additional crops for their sustenance, thus the demand for meat and dairy is straining crop production. A diet rich in grains and vegetables is considered more healthful than one rich in meat. However, the situation is not as simple as advising all citizens to become vegetarians. A significant part of the increase in livestock is grass-fed, and the grasslands on which they live are unsuitable for other crops; pigs and poultry are often fed on human food waste. Moreover, meat is the most concentrated source of minerals and vitamins in developed countries. And in these locations, new breeds of animals are optimizing meat production. However, there have been a number of controversial proposals to reduce the production of beef, partly because of the health risks associated with high-fat foods and partly because of the greenhouse gas emissions of livestock.
  • Aquaculture, mainly of fish and other aquatic species such as oysters and shrimp, is already a major source of food, providing nearly 3 billion people with at least 15% of their protein intake. The advantages include the ability to control the environment in which the fish and other species live and not have to worry about external factors such as pollution and changing ocean conditions. The technology stands to improve with advances in hatchery systems, refinement of stock to species that require shorter breeding cycles, and those that are more tolerant to a wider range of temperature and salinity. In addition, aquaculture does have negative environmental impacts, for example, releasing waste into the natural environment, which is a significant source of pollution. This can be improved by integrating land and ocean production; for example, using waste from the land as food and nutrients for aquaculture and concentrating on species such as oysters that produce less waste and use filtration to keep the water clean. Aquaculture is not yet a globally applied technique, and there is much to gain from its application in parts of the world such as Africa. This will take a major investment in infrastructure.
an aquaculture tank containing live fish
Commerical fish farming.
Credit: Burt Lum from& Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

All of these approaches have been tested and yield positive results. However, their implementation will require decisions by governments as well as substantial investment. Such investment is most challenging in under-developed nations, where policies will need to be conducive to promoting family-run farms. Nevertheless, consideration of these approaches must increase for nations to attempt to feed their citizens in the face of population increase and climate change.

Check Your Understanding

Food Security Issues

Food Security Issues ksc17

Food security refers to a wide range of factors that affect the supply of food in sufficient quantities to keep populations nourished. As we have seen, a number of scenarios related to climate change have the potential to disrupt that supply. The most drastic food supply issues derive from extreme events such as natural disasters, political unrest, as well as climate change. For example, floods and heat waves can drastically reduce the supply of food. Currently, estimates suggest that more than 1 billion people are estimated to lack sufficient dietary energy availability, and at least twice that number suffer micronutrient deficiencies.

Refugee women standing in food line.
Darfurian Refugees in Eastern Chad, Sudan. Refugee camps often have severe food shortages.

A key component of availability of food is the price. Recently, in the US, food prices have increased significantly. This situation has been part of a global increase in the price of food, driven in part by weather events such as the prolonged drought in Australia, and floods in the Midwest and parts of Southeast Asia. This increase has led to demonstrations and rioting in more than 14 countries. The situation is particularly bad in Haiti, where citizens have eaten mud cakes just to survive, and hunger and starvation constantly have the potential to cause anarchy.

Two children standing next to mudcakes baking in the sun
Mudcakes in Haiti.

Food prices are controlled by many other factors besides climate change; for example, currency fluctuations, import and export policy, energy costs, as well as population growth. In the future, climate change and population growth are likely to cause major food security problems. Solutions to the problem must include a combination of concerted efforts to protect people all over the world who are facing hunger and starvation, changes to agricultural practices discussed previously, as well as action to reduce greenhouse gases.

Graph of FAO Food Price Index
Increase in world food prices from 1990 to 2012. The index is calculated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

A line graph titled "FAO Food Price Index," depicting the food price index values from 1990 to 2013. The x-axis represents dates, marked at quarterly intervals (e.g., Q1 1990 to Q1 2013), while the y-axis shows the index value ranging from 80 to 250. The graph shows a fluctuating trend: a gradual increase from 1990 to around 1996, a decline until the early 2000s, a steady rise from 2003, a sharp peak around 2008-2011 exceeding 230, followed by a decline and subsequent fluctuations toward 2013.

  • Graph Overview
    • Title: FAO Food Price Index
    • Type: Line graph
    • Time Period: 1990 to 2013
  • Axes
    • X-axis: Dates (Q1 1990 to Q1 2013)
    • Y-axis: Index value (80 to 250)
  • Trend
    • 1990-1996: Gradual increase
    • 1996-2003: Decline
    • 2003-2008: Steady rise
    • 2008-2011: Sharp peak above 230
    • 2011-2013: Decline with fluctuations

As we have seen, biofuels have the potential to cause major food security issues. Ethanol produced from corn requires a lot of crops compared to other biofuel sources. In fact, one gas tank’s worth of ethanol fuel requires the same amount of corn that could feed one person for an entire year. Thus, competition for corn between food suppliers and energy producers has the potential to increase corn process drastically and potentially lead to shortages. This has led many to question the ethics of using corn as a source of fuel. Subsidies for biofuel production by farmers in the US and Europe are therefore extremely controversial.

One of the most difficult problems facing agriculture is that the industry itself is a major contributor to greenhouse gases. A considerable amount of energy is used up producing fertilizers, running the factories that convert crops into packaged food, and transporting the food to market. Currently, agricultural activities around the world are responsible for 12% of greenhouse gas emissions, actually more like 30% if the impact of deforestation and the production of nitrogen fertilizers are included. Because more fertilizer and more deforestation will be required to feed the world’s growing populations, this number is set to increase.

Fertilizer factory in Romania creating a lot of steam/smoke
A fertilizer factory in Romania.

So, where is all of this headed? It's very hard to predict. Food, like water, is so vital for human livelihood, and climate change is almost certain to cause shortages in some regions of the planet. The likelihood, therefore, is for intensifying conflict in these parts of the globe in the future.

Check Your Understanding

Module Summary and Final Tasks

Module Summary and Final Tasks jls164

End of Module Recap:

In this module, you should have mastered the following concepts:

  • population increase and how it will challenge supplying food;
  • climate change forecasts that affect the food supply;
  • impact of climate change on terrestrial food sources;
  • what the future of fisheries may be;
  • climate change and its impact on weeds, diseases, and insect pests
  • the biofuel debate: advantages and ethical and environmental problems
  • adapting food production to increasing population and climate change
  • food security issues in the future

Assignments

You should have read the contents of this module carefully, completed and submitted any labs, the Yellowdig Entry and Reply and taken the Module Quiz. If you have not done so already, please do so before moving on to the next module. Incomplete assignments will negatively impact your final grade.